What strategies can be used to manage human-wildlife interactions?

The choice emphasizing education and regulated population control measures is correct because it reflects a comprehensive and effective approach to managing human-wildlife interactions. Education fosters a greater understanding of wildlife behavior, the ecological role of various species, and the implications of human actions on these animals. This knowledge can lead to better coexistence strategies, such as securing garbage, using fencing, and creating wildlife corridors, which help mitigate conflicts.

Regulated population control measures are also essential, as they ensure that wildlife populations are maintained at sustainable levels that are compatible with local human populations. This can involve practices like managed hunting, legal trapping, or population monitoring, which allow for wildlife species to thrive without causing problems in residential areas.

Other options lack effectiveness or feasibility. Relying solely on wildlife hunting does not address the root causes of human-wildlife conflict and can lead to further imbalances in ecosystems. The idea of removing all wild animals from urban areas is impractical and would disrupt local ecosystems, as wildlife plays a significant role in maintaining ecological balance. Lastly, building more residences in natural habitats would likely increase conflicts and habitat destruction, exacerbating the very issue that management strategies aim to resolve.